How artificial intelligence can make law radically better.
Order the BookOr start free: the 2016 paper that named the thesis. Or listen: the audiobook.
The Legal Singularity argues that AI can make law more predictable, coherent, and fair. Aidid and Alarie examine the limits of today's legal institutions and show how legal prediction could transform the way law is interpreted, applied, and delivered. The result is an ambitious case for what they call the legal singularity: a future state in which law becomes functionally complete.
A powerful and important book. The fundamental insight, that artificial intelligence will transform not just the specific content of legal rules but the general nature of law, is surely correct. Essential reading for legal theorists.
Daniel Markovits Guido Calabresi Professor of Law, Yale Law SchoolA compelling case that law as we know it will change dramatically, and that justice will be the biggest beneficiary.
Lawrence Lessig Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law SchoolTimely, challenging, and profound. A book that deserves to be read widely by naysayers and evangelists alike.
Richard Susskind OBE KC (Hon) Author of Tomorrow's LawyersThe book opens by introducing the legal singularity and recounting the history of legal information, then defines computational law and develops the idea of complete law. A full chapter, "Defending the Legal Singularity from Its Critics," takes the objections head on. Three chapters work through the implications for the judiciary, for lawyers and the public, and for governments; a chapter on ethics, a conclusion, and an afterword on ChatGPT close it. The chapter records are at the publisher's page.
Why read it in 2026? The book was written before the newest generation of AI systems, and that is the point: its argument is about the trajectory of legal prediction, not any one model. The trajectory has only steepened since 2023, and the later work below carries it forward.
The argument's origin is free to read: The Path of the Law: Towards Legal Singularity, the 2016 University of Toronto Law Journal paper that named the term, is the thesis in seed form, at no cost.
The Legal Singularity argued that AI-enabled prediction can make law complete and knowable. Superjustice (Oxford University Press, July 30, 2026, by Benjamin Alarie with Samuel Becher) asks how entire legal systems should be redesigned once those capabilities exist. Between the two sit LexOptima (2025) and Legal Order in the Age of AI Agents (forthcoming 2026); in practice, Blue J applies the trajectory to tax.
Explore SuperjusticeChoose your preferred retailer.